Feb 27, 2008

...

i like MSNBC's Debates format more than CNN's. things felt more intimate with Tim Russert. plus Tim's questions were hypothetical off the hooks...stuff like "if China were, let's say in a year, to become a nation of marauding cannibals, would you as president consider invading The Big Red One?" or "let's say Putin is actually a Siberian moon goddess, how many hecatombs do you sacrifice to her, *if* any at all?"

entertaining.

2 comments:

BB said...

Yeah, I thought it was weird when Clinton was all "Putin IS a Siberian moon goddess, wolf's bane motherfuckers!!" but I agreed that 13 hecatombs made sense as a sacrifice. Whereas Obama just looked flustered. Sorry Logan, but I'm one of those exit pollers who really put "Knowledge of Appropriate Number of Hecatombs" up there with "Iraq War".

rodney k said...

According to the NY Times, there's NO SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCE between the number of hecatombs Clinton suggests, and the 13 proposed by Obama. It seems what voters are responding to is Obama's promise of a more "upbeat," "hopeful" sacrifice.

Meanwhile, keeping with his hardball role in the campaign, Bill was in Austin this morning insinuating that Obama can't locate the FATTEST CHINES.